2nd one sounds like it could've been more iffy, but that could be just the

lack of info in the article. Presumably the case was reviewed and any appropriate disciplinary action was considered and/or taken. I honestly had never heard of either case before this article, so don't know the details.

In response to this post by Beerman

Posted: 10/19/2021 at 11:01AM

News: qualified immunity wins out in SCOTUS -- HokieDan95 10/19/2021 10:44AM

We'd have won that one if it wasn't for Moscow Mitch!!!! ** -- ResistHoo 10/19/2021 11:20AM

Shields them from liability and also accountability. I thought that's what -- Seattle .Hoo 10/19/2021 11:16AM

Qualified immunity is awful. -- WahooMatt05 10/19/2021 11:02AM

Good. ** -- Hoodafan 10/19/2021 10:59AM

Reads more like... -- Beerman 10/19/2021 10:50AM

Yeah that’s a much more accurate take. It doesn’t sound like the -- 111Balz 10/19/2021 12:42PM

2nd one sounds like it could've been more iffy, but that could be just the -- Hoodafan 10/19/2021 11:01AM

Qualified Immunity is a horrible doctrine ** -- HptHokie 10/19/2021 10:48AM

2nd one sounds like it could've been more iffy, but that could be just the

Insert a Link